<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carry the one</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skeltoac.com/2007/12/06/carry-the-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skeltoac.com/2007/12/06/carry-the-one/</link>
	<description>First name: Andy. Last name: Skelton.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-RC1-10026</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: morag maclachlan</title>
		<link>http://skeltoac.com/2007/12/06/carry-the-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1540</link>
		<dc:creator>morag maclachlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 21:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeltoac.com/2007/12/06/carry-the-one/#comment-1540</guid>
		<description>left to right addition is a well known and tried and tested method in fact it is what our children are taught in school alongside right to left "traditional" addition</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>left to right addition is a well known and tried and tested method in fact it is what our children are taught in school alongside right to left &#8220;traditional&#8221; addition</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Tremblay</title>
		<link>http://skeltoac.com/2007/12/06/carry-the-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1515</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeltoac.com/2007/12/06/carry-the-one/#comment-1515</guid>
		<description>Rereading your post reminded me of Ilya Prigogine's book on chaos theory ... surprisingly readable. And that reminded me of 1985 with Martin Gardiner's "Recreations" column in SciAm ... had me racing to my C=64 to cobbling together imaginary math routines using assembler, making BIOS calls. Which brings me to my point: does anybody even /grok/ assembler anymore? Or *heaven forbid* ML?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rereading your post reminded me of Ilya Prigogine&#8217;s book on chaos theory &#8230; surprisingly readable. And that reminded me of 1985 with Martin Gardiner&#8217;s &#8220;Recreations&#8221; column in SciAm &#8230; had me racing to my C=64 to cobbling together imaginary math routines using assembler, making BIOS calls. Which brings me to my point: does anybody even /grok/ assembler anymore? Or *heaven forbid* ML?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned Henry</title>
		<link>http://skeltoac.com/2007/12/06/carry-the-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1513</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeltoac.com/2007/12/06/carry-the-one/#comment-1513</guid>
		<description>Even when I was little, while I was learning in school the aforementioned stacking method, I found myself adding or subtracting the columns on the left first.  The only times it has seemed slower are when the numbers are in the millions or above and when three or more entries are involved.  I don't think it's that unusual.  I think it's actually more natural.  Indeed, I asked a couple of my friends, and they do it the same way.

I agree with Ben.  I think the autistic savants (the preferred term for idiot savants, per the referenced DSM-IV and forthcoming DSM-V) are able to compute on a much more complex level.  Straightforward addition and subtraction are not on this level.  Simply notice that when you switch from addition to multi-digit multiplication you can no longer operate from left to right.

There are other interesting short-cuts I find myself performing with multiplication and division, such as separating the columns for one of the two numbers and then bringing the products back together.  I'm sure others with average mathematical skills like mine perform similar tasks, but to the savants, such an operation is child's play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even when I was little, while I was learning in school the aforementioned stacking method, I found myself adding or subtracting the columns on the left first.  The only times it has seemed slower are when the numbers are in the millions or above and when three or more entries are involved.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s that unusual.  I think it&#8217;s actually more natural.  Indeed, I asked a couple of my friends, and they do it the same way.</p>
<p>I agree with Ben.  I think the autistic savants (the preferred term for idiot savants, per the referenced DSM-IV and forthcoming DSM-V) are able to compute on a much more complex level.  Straightforward addition and subtraction are not on this level.  Simply notice that when you switch from addition to multi-digit multiplication you can no longer operate from left to right.</p>
<p>There are other interesting short-cuts I find myself performing with multiplication and division, such as separating the columns for one of the two numbers and then bringing the products back together.  I&#8217;m sure others with average mathematical skills like mine perform similar tasks, but to the savants, such an operation is child&#8217;s play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Tremblay</title>
		<link>http://skeltoac.com/2007/12/06/carry-the-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1462</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 02:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeltoac.com/2007/12/06/carry-the-one/#comment-1462</guid>
		<description>Dunno, but ... like the folk who can find day of week for any date? (Coincidentally, the first algo we were asked to write in our APL course. I'm old ... don't ask.) Seems to me those are conceptually different from folk who can deal with transcendental functions. I mean ... those have a grasp of math and can prolly explicate their reasoning (read: the dreaded "Show your work" metric.) while the former get the answers to problems that are more arithmetic than math and likely can't explicate it at all.
Just a thot ... I groked lasers in grade 3 but flunked math in grade 10 cuz of quadratic equations. *shrug*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dunno, but &#8230; like the folk who can find day of week for any date? (Coincidentally, the first algo we were asked to write in our APL course. I&#8217;m old &#8230; don&#8217;t ask.) Seems to me those are conceptually different from folk who can deal with transcendental functions. I mean &#8230; those have a grasp of math and can prolly explicate their reasoning (read: the dreaded &#8220;Show your work&#8221; metric.) while the former get the answers to problems that are more arithmetic than math and likely can&#8217;t explicate it at all.<br />
Just a thot &#8230; I groked lasers in grade 3 but flunked math in grade 10 cuz of quadratic equations. *shrug*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
